data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81671/81671fad68a35a9d3effaed1c4fd0636b2ce5367" alt=""
Look, burning Qu'rans is a disrespectful and unnecessarily stupid thing to do, like eating a ham sandwich in a synagogue. Far more effective to just read the thing outloud, or present quotes along with pictures of the happy Islamists busily at their daily activities, as Geert Wilders did in Fitna. Of course, such actions are also not to be taken lightly, as Imams have called for poor Geert to be beheaded, and free minded liberals have denounced his movie, but at least it tangibly brings the argument to the foreground, whereas burning Qu'rans does not.
The most embarrassing thing about this episode, in my opinion, is the manner in which our nation’s leaders responded. Just a few days ago, B. Obama and H. Clinton were all about defending our Constitutionally protected rights to property and religious expression, no matter how brazenly offensive the action taken. Now, they have abandoned those high sounding principles, completely reversing themselves over a church in Florida.
The one guy consistent – Michael Bloomberg?!!
Good grief.
I think it's our duty as free men to "offend" Moslems-as-Moslems in whatever way we can; and burning Korans does that nicely. Or even just stating the intention to burn one.
ReplyDelete*grin* I just notices that you've apparently changed the title of this piece.
ReplyDeleteThe Muslims act in very twisted and weird ways, no doubt about it. But what is far more concerning to me is when we start showing deference to their preferences. Check out the Steyn piece at the top of the roster. He's on the money again.
ReplyDeleteTrips to Scandinavia not withstanding, the guy's got to get back on it.